|
< Back
to Articles Index
The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly - Health and Society, Vol. 54, No. 3, Summer 1976, 249-298.
Child Health in America: Toward a Rational
Public Policy
ELI H. NEWBERGER
CAROLYN MOORE NEWBERGER
JULIUS B. RICHMOND
Analysis of currently available data on
mortality and morbidity indicates that the
major organic illnesses of childhood, and their
developmental consequences, are susceptible
in part to the technical interventions of American
medical science. Environmental forces, however,
exert a powerful impact on the health of children
in the United States, manifested both in the
disproportionate toll of most organic diseases
on poor and nonwhite populations and in such
increasingly important symptoms of familial,
social, and behavioral distress as child abuse,
accidents, and childhood suicide. Review of
the nature, quality, and distribution of child
health services demonstrates a systemic inability
to reach and treat the children most in need
of them. A rational basis for child health
policy includes: appropriate concepts of health,
disease, and preventive and therapeutic intervention;
a capacity to acknowledge. to measure, and
to act on the familial and environmental, as
well as the medical, sources of illness; an
orientation to the developmental and social
implications of good and poor child health;
and a commitment to enable all children to
receive health services.
The data and this policy framework lead
to these program recommendations: the channeling
of resources into a more rational system which
guarantees equity and access; a planning and
program implementation mechanism which addresses
the health needs of diverse local populations
and which makes real the advocacy concept;
a screening, evaluation, and surveillance methodology;
a delivery system which both applies preventive
and curative health technology and addresses
basic life needs of children; and a coherent
program for the training, assignment, and supervision
of the several kinds of manpower which such
a system would require.
Introduction: Assumptions and Objectives
As we enter the United States' third century
and contemplate the state of the health of its
children, we might identify four cardinal assumptions
underlying the present health care system.
The first assumption is that the development
of technology is tantamount to the control
of illness. This century has seen extraordinary
progress in our ability to control major organic
illness phenomena, yet the fruits of this progress
do not reach all of our children. There are
large groups of children who either are unserved
or poorly served by health services in America.
A second assumption is that health care
for children is equivalent to providing them
with immunizations and with acute illness intervention.
How to promote children's health is not, in
fact, a primary consideration in the overall
scheme of health services in the United States,
particularly for children in low-income families.
The relationship between a child's social and
physical context, including his family's health
and economic status, and his later functioning
as an adult is generally ignored in present
practice.
A third assumption is that health services
are properly and best dispensed by a physician.
An appropriate concept of child health obliges
re-examination of this assumption. The issue
is not only concerned with the conservation
of precious and highly trained manpower, and
who is competent to perform which technical
tasks, but also with defining what are the
commitments and responsibilities to children's
health and who assumes them.
The fourth assumption is that more of the same
will do a better job, or that the provision
of adequate services insures their use.
If we do not yet understand what is necessary
to promote good health, awareness of the various
needs of diverse populations which are not and
cannot be met by our current health structures
necessitates a reexamination of health delivery
mechanisms as well as the content of health services.
The task of this paper is to address and challenge
these assumptions by examining (1) the status
of child health: the major health problems
of children in the United States, their distribution,
and how and in what ways our current health system
responds and fails to respond to these problems;
(2) the context of child health: the
conditions, services, and circumstances which
most importantly affect children's present and
future health and life functioning; the importance
to life functioning of the environment in which
a child grows as well as the "services" which
he and his family receive; (3) the concept
of child health: the conceptual basis for
current practice, and alternative concepts for
the re-examination and restructuring of health
care for children; and (4) program recommendations for
a better health structure.
The Status of Child Health in The United States
Principal Causes of Death and Illness among
American Children
Mortality In the decade 1964-1974 the
infant mortality rate (deaths in the first year
of life per 1,000 children born alive) declined
from 24.8 to 16.5. The major portion of this
toll still occurs during the first month of life.
There remain, however, great disparities among
the rates for children of differing racial backgrounds
and geographic settings (Wegman, 1975). In the
District of Columbia, 1974 witnessed an increase
in the infant mortality rate to 26.0 from 24.2
in 1973; this was the highest rate recorded in
a state-by-state breakdown of the data. The uniquely
unfavorable experience of the nation's capital,
with its large impoverished black community,
reflects the vulnerability of nonwhite, poor
babies elsewhere in the United States (Institute
of Medicine, 1973). Infant mortality rates for
nonwhites are over 150 percent those of whites
(National Center for Health Statistics, 1974a;
National Council of Organizations for Children
and Youth, 1976).
Causes of infant mortality and corresponding
infant mortality rates for 1974 are congenital
anomalies (2.9), influenza and pneumonia (0.9),
birth injuries (0.6), asphyxia of the newborn,
unspecified (1.5), immaturity, unqualified (1.5),
other diseases of early infancy (5.3), certain
gastrointestinal diseases (0.3) and all other
causes (3.7). If one considers that in 1973,
the United States placed sixteenth in the world
in infant mortality, behind East Germany and
Hong Kong (Wegman, 1975), and recognizes the
impact on infant mortality of the investments
in maternal and child health services in the
United Kingdom and Sweden (Wallace, 1975), it
is clear that much of this toll might have been
prevented. This is also the clear implication
of Kessner's important study of the relationship
between services and infant death in New York
City (Institute of Medicine, 1973).
In the population of children age one to four
years, the principal causes of death and their
frequency per 100,000 estimated population in
1973 (death rate) are accidents (19.6), motor
vehicle accidents (12.3), congenital anomalies
(9.6), malignant neoplasms (6.4), influenza and
pneumonia (5.9), homicide (2.5), diseases of
the heart (2.1), meningitis (1.6), enteritis
and other diarrheal diseases (1.0), cerebrovascular
diseases (1.0), and anemias (0.6) (National Center
for Health Statistics, 1976a: 359). For children
five to fourteen years of age, the principal
causes of death and the death rates in 1973 are
motor vehicle accidents (10.6), all other accidents
(10.2), malignant neoplasms (5.4), congenital
anomalies (2.2), influenza and pneumonia (1.4),
homicide (1.1), diseases of the heart (1.0),
cerebrovascular diseases (0.6), suicide (0.4),
benign neoplasms and neoplasms of unspecified
nature (0.4), and anemias (0.3) (National Center
for Health Statistics, 1976a: 361).
Although mortality rates in early childhood
demonstrate a greater decline since 1900 than
the rates for any other group, the death rate
for minority preschool children remains about
50 percent higher than the rate for their white
counterparts (National Center for Health Statistics,
1976a: 340-341). Wegman (1975) points out that
it is well to recognize that by far the greater
part of the decline in childhood mortality occurred
before 1940, prior to the major introduction
of antibiotics and chemotherapy. This may be
ascribed to environmental improvement and to
better living standards.
The extraordinary mortality due to accidents
is distributed unequally in regard to ethnic
and socioeconomic status. An analysis of accident
death rates performed by the National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development (1971)
indicates a 250 percent greater infant mortality
rate resulting from accidents for nonwhite children,
and death rates for older children exceeding
150 percent of the rates for whites. Inordinately
high death rates from infectious diseases, influenza,
and pneumonia, for minority and poor children
(National Center for Health Statistics, 1976a;
Richmond and Weinberger, 1970) likewise suggest
a disproportionate impact of environmental forces
on this population.
Morbidity Although data on acute and
chronic illness of children in the United States
are available from a number of surveys, we lack
such a data base on childhood morbidity as is
systematically developed for mortality. This
is partly but not exclusively due to the nature
of illness in children and to the varying utilization
of health services: most symptoms of pediatric
illness are limited in duration if not in intensity,
and not all come to the attention of health providers.
Useful recent data comes from the household
interviews performed in 1973 and 1974 as part
of the National Health Survey (National Center
for Health Statistics, 1975). The most frequent
acute conditions reported by parents of children
under six years of age (excluding all conditions
involving neither restricted activity nor medical
attention) with extrapolated incidence estimates
in thousands, are: respiratory conditions (32,486),
infective and parasitic diseases (9,864), other
acute conditions (9,515), injuries (7,211), and
digestive system conditions (2,099). For children
six to 16 years of age, the illnesses and incidence
estimates are: respiratory conditions (55,558),
injuries (16,422), infective and parasitic conditions
(13,384), other acute conditions (10,614), and
digestive system conditions (4,593).
Acute illness prompts most childhood medical
visits, but poor children are less likely to
see a doctor than more affluent children, even
though they suffer transient disability more
frequently and are more susceptive to handicaps
which exert a lasting effect on their productivity
(Lowe and Alexander, 1974: 149). Brain damage
and mental retardation correlate closely with
low birth weight and prematurity (Niswander and
Gordon, 1972), which in turn are associated frequently
with low social class, minority group status,
and lack of access to adequate prenatal care
(Institute of Medicine, 1973).
Malnutrition has been found to be a problem
of major importance among our country's poor
(Carter, 1974; Owen et al., 1974). Over 10 percent
of poor children and over 30 percent of poor
infants in some surveys are found to suffer from
iron deficiency anemia (Katzman et al., 1972;
Filer, 1969; Owen et al., 1971). When we realize
that roughly one quarter of our nation's children
live in families whose income falls below the
minimum level considered necessary for adequate
nutrition, the magnitude of the problem of undernutrition
becomes apparent (National Council on Hunger
and Malnutrition. . ., 1972). Despite the law
that federal food programs are to be available
to all poor families, in 1972 only one-third
of poverty-stricken children attending public
school were in school lunch programs, and in
1974 only 35.6 percent of poor families participated
in food-stamp programs. Indeed, our poorest families
cannot afford to purchase food stamps (Pollack,
1975). Childhood malnutrition can be understood-and
intervention directed-both in terms of available
nutrients and in reference to the child's familial,
social, and economic setting which may restrict
the availability and utilization of food (Newberger
et al., 1976).
The effects of malnutrition on the growing child
may be grave. Both human and animal studies show
that a combination of prenatal and postnatal
undernutrition may jeopardize brain development.
It has been estimated that nearly 60 percent
of all pregnant women with incomes below the
poverty level and 44 percent of pregnant women
at two to three times the poverty level consume
fewer calories than are necessary for the normal
intrauterine development of their children (Bergner
and Susser, 1970; Livingston et al., 1975). Malnutrition
during the first months of extrauterine life
may result in a decrease of up to 20 percent
of the normal number of animal brain cells (Winick,
1971). Prolonged malnutrition, particularly if
it occurs before five years of age, may lastingly
affect learning ability, body growth, and rate
of maturation, as well as ultimate size and productivity
(Monckeberg et al., 1972; Food and Nutrition
Board, National Academy of Sciences, 1974).
Dental caries rank high among the health problems
of children (National Center for Health Statistics,
1974b; Creighton, 1969; Whitenhurst et al., 1968).
Yet in 1971, there was a lower dentist-to-population
ratio than in 1951 (National Center for Health
Statistics, 1973). Examination of children enrolling
in Headstart programs during the summer of 1966
revealed that between 40 and 70 percent had dental
caries (North, 1967). And, when poor children
receive dental treatment, their carious teeth
seem more likely to be extracted than filled
(National Center for Health Statistics, 1974b).
Twenty-one million of the 83.8 million youth
aged 0 to 21 in the United States required eye
care, of whom 180,000 were partially sighted,
and of whom 13,000 were totally blind (Rand Corporation,
1974b). In this same year, approximately 8 million
had mild hearing impairment, 440,000 were hard
of hearing, and about 50,000 were profoundly
deaf (Rand Corporation, 1974b). Many of the conditions
which predispose to sensory handicap, such as
prematurity, infectious disease, and accidents,
are found disproportionately among the poor and
nonwhite populations. Further, the immunizations
against measles, mumps, rubella, and Rh sensitivity,
which are among the primary tools for handicap
prevention, are neither equally nor adequately
distributed (Center for Disease Control, 1975).
The major organic illnesses of childhood are
increasingly being overcome by medical science.
Great progress has been made toward the control
of infectious diseases, surgical diseases, immune
disorders, and cancer. Amniocentesis has made
the antenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders
possible, and counseling, birth control, and
the increasing acceptance of abortion have made
possible the prospect of their elimination (Nadler,
1976). The availability of abortion also appears
to be associated with a decrease in the frequency
of prematurity (Pakter and Nelson, 1974) and
in maternal and infant mortality (Pakter et al.,
1973).
Behavioral and Psychophysiologic Illness
Behavior and psychophysiologic illnesses,
on the other hand, appear to be increasingly prevalent.
Haggerty, Roghmann, and Pless (1975) have drawn
attention to the significance of this "new
morbidity" for child health practice. But
the "mental health" of children is largely
neglected (Joint Commission on the Mental Health
of Children, 1970), notwithstanding the increasing
frequency of such markers of child mental illness
as suicide and rates of psychiatric hospitalization
(National Center for Health Statistics, 1976a;
National Institute of Mental Health, 1974a; 1974b). "Special
education" classes, where they exist, are
often dumping grounds for "problem" children
(Task Force on Children Out of School, 1970).
Schools for the emotionally disturbed and the
retarded are too often prisons for children with
no alternative; they are documented in the lay
press in the disclosures of conditions at the
Willowbrook School in New York State and the
Belchertown State School in Massachusetts. Gil's
review (1974:83) of data on American children
in institutions and the goals and methods of
institutional programs concludes: "residential
child care can operate to achieve constructive
and liberative objectives as well as destructive
and oppressive ones. The use to which private
boarding schools are put demonstrates this. Our
child welfare institutions could be transformed
into channels for equality, freedom and creativity
if, and when, we redefine their social purpose
in these terms. To achieve this requires a broad
commitment to the intrinsic and equal worth of
every child."
The uncritical use of amphetamines among "hyperactive" elementary
school children illustrates the willingness with
which some professionals may adopt means of suppressing
rather than treating the familial, environmental,
and endogenous causes of deviant child behavior. "Now
that there appear to be at least 300,000 children
in elementary schools in the United States on
psychotropic medication for school difficulties,
and that in one county, the school nurses administer
medication to 61 percent of these children, it
behooves both physicians and schools to establish
a close liaison in their management efforts" (Krager
and Safer, 1974:1120).
Accidents, by far the greatest cause of mortality
and morbidity among children, can be considered
as part of a complex of illnesses which are socially
and environmentally, as opposed to primarily
organically, derived. Accidents, child abuse
and neglect, plumbism, ingestions of poisonous
substances, and failure to thrive, all reflect
situations in which a young child cannot sufficiently
be protected in a hazardous environment, either
from the exigencies of the physical setting itself,
or from his parents' problems in nurturing him.
Plumbism, or lead poisoning, is found almost
exclusively in the urban slums (Blanksma et al.,
1969). Lead poisoning is generally an insidious
disease. A child can carry dangerously high levels
of lead without showing external symptoms. Lead
poisoning by a recent estimate affects 400,000
American children annually; it causes 200 deaths.
The report observed that 16,000 of the 400,000
children affected required treatment, 3,200 incurred
moderate to severe brain damage, and 800 children
incurred brain damage severe enough to require
care for the rest of their lives. Lead poisoning
is a preventable disease, yet it may cripple
more children than did polio before the anti
poliomyelitis vaccines were developed (Needleman,
1975).
Treatment involves screening, deleading afflicted
children with chelating agents, and renovating
some seven million units of housing painted with
lead-based paint. Atmospheric lead in the vicinity
of a secondary lead smelter in Memphis, Tennessee,
was associated both with symptoms of lead toxicity
and high blood lead levels in smelter workers
and their children (Center for Disease Control,
1976a: 85-86):
Such reports emphasize the importance of improved
work practices and engineering controls not
only in safeguarding worker health, but also
in shielding families of workers from contact
with toxic industrial materials.
Although the government is increasingly aware
of the problem, money to treat and eliminate
lead poisoning has been committed in pitifully
small amounts. The few city programs which exist
have clearly inadequate resources to control
the disease because of limited local funds. Acknowledgment
of the problem and the signing of the Lead-Based
Paint Poisoning Prevention Act is unfortunately
meaningless if the budget does not include adequate
funds for implementing effective programs.
Accurate incidence statistics for child abuse
are not yet available, and can only be estimated.
Although the actual numbers of reported cases
indicate a nationwide annual incidence of up
to 200,000 cases a year, indirectly acquired
data from a survey in which a nationwide sample
of respondents in a population representative
of a standard metropolitan statistical area were
asked whether they knew personally of serious
injuries inflicted on children during the previous
year indicated between 2.5 and 4.8 million cases
(American Humane Association, 1976; Gil, 1970).
This extrapolation to the national population
has been subject to careful analysis and is felt
in general to represent an upper margin of estimate
(Light, 1973). When taken together with estimates
of the prevalence of cases on the books of child
welfare agencies and the woefully inadequate
state of American child welfare services, this
indicates a problem of enormous magnitude (Newberger
and Hyde, 1975; Jenkins, 1974; Newberger and
Daniel, 1976).
The impact on child health of the social acceptance
of violence and its promotion on television has
recently been underlined by Somers (1976). Notwithstanding
a substantial literature on the effects of television
violence on children's behavior, the industry,
government, and health professionals all appear
reluctant to acknowledge and to act on this potent
source of harm. Violence sells. Somers quotes
S. Strickland's 1975 address to the Women's National
Democratic Club (Somers, 1976: 812): ".
. . between the ages of five and fifteen, the
average American child will view the killing
of more than 13,000 persons on television."
A rich understanding of child health and its
meaning for later functioning are offered in
two recent studies. Haggerty et al. (1975:316)
note in the conclusion of a broadly conceived
investigation into child health in the setting
of Monroe County, New York: "the current
major health problems of children, as seen by
the community, are those that would have barely
been mentioned a generation ago. Learning difficulties,
visual problems and the problems of adolescents
in coping and adjusting are today the most common
concerns about children." The final volume
of the 1,OOO-family survey of Newcastle Upon
Tyne, England (Miller et al., 1974:298) gives
longitudinal follow up of a cohort of children
born in 1947 and a vivid impression of the significance
of health and ill health for human development
which helps inform our more limited understanding
of the consequences of childhood morbidity in
the United States:
The health of the children in our city was
never better than in the years of our study.
Yet at fifteen not less than one in five had
either handicap, recurrent illness, intellectual
limitation, poor education performance or severe
difficulties of emotional or social adaptation.
This residual disability is the true measure
of our failure to deal effectively with the
physical and educational discorders of children,
and we do not yet know how much of the effects
of physical illness or emotional disturbance
will only become apparent later in life.
The Gap Between Technology and Delivery
The Distribution of Preventive Health Care
Measles, diphtheria, and polio are largely preventable
diseases, thanks to the development of effective
vaccines. In 1962, Congress passed the Vaccination
Assistance Act, whose funds enabled the vaccination
of millions of children against a variety of
diseases, including the above three. The 1974
United States Immunization Survey (Center for
Disease Control, 1975) suggests a prevalence
of completed polio immunizations in children
aged one to four of 63.1 percent; for diphtheriatetanus-pertussis
immunization of 69.5 percent; and for measles
64.5 percent. In general, poor children and
rural children received these preventive services
less frequently; in this respect immunizations
serve as an accurate marker of the distribution
of child health services (National Center for
Health Statistics, 1976a). (In fact, immunizations
are among the simplest services to deliver,
and the prevalence estimates from the Immunization
Survey provide if anything an inflated qualitative
impression of children's contact with health
services.) The unequal distribution of immunizations
has a predictable impact.
In Des Moines County, Iowa, from July 1971 to
January 1972, a measles epidemic took place.
It was found that the effectiveness of the measles
vaccine was over 90 percent and that "the
overwhelming majority of cases continues to occur
in unvaccinated children. The effectiveness of
the vaccine was also demonstrated by the sharp
decline in the number of cases two weeks after
the vaccination campaign" (Center for Disease
Control, 1972a: 13).
Diphtheria was observed in epidemic form on
or near the Navajo Indian Reservation in Arizona
and New Mexico. Although there were no deaths,
five patients had myocarditis and/or varying
degrees of neurologic involvement, and two of
these had respiratory arrests and required artificial
ventilation; of the 44 cases six had been fully
vaccinated (Center for Disease Control, 1973;
Munford et al., 1974).
Most of the 31 cases in the pertussis outbreak
in Knoxville, Tennessee, between May and December
1975, occurred in children from low-income neighborhoods
and housing projects. Although three cases (10%)
were fully immunized for their ages, 15 (48%)
were partially immunized, and 13 (42%) had received
no pertussis vaccine at all. Immunization surveys
demonstrated much higher immunization levels
in more affluent children (Center for Disease
Control, 1976b).
The possibility of polio outbreaks is also of
concern. In a serologic survey of 289 Syracuse
children two to six years old, 55 percent had
no demonstrable antibodies to polio virus Type
I, and 62 percent were negative for Type 3 (Lamb
and Feldman, 1971). The population at risk is
mainly poor and preschool. Most of the small
outbreaks of paralytic poliomyelitis during recent
years have concentrated in inner-city areas.
The problem with implementing urgently needed
vaccination programs is only partly one of money
and of delivery, although these are the major
necessary-and lacking-elements in this aspect
of preventive child health. A coherent strategy
for anticipating and preventing these illnesses
would address the social as well as economic
costs and benefits of action and inaction. A
mathematical benefit-cost model with important
policy implications has been developed by Schoenbaum
et at (1976) and has been applied to rubella
immunizations. (The authors conclude that current
United States practice of vaccinating children
once at an early age prevents fewer cases of
congenital rubella syndrome than were the vaccine
to be offered to females at the age of 12; "benefits" and "costs" are
also defined both in dollars and cents and in
quantifiable human terms, both for the congenital
rubella syndrome and for acute rubella infection.)
Delivery of Health Services
Even though the prevalence of handicapping conditions
and their antecedents in childhood illness
is disproportionately greater among the poor,
only 15.7 percent of children under 17 from
families whose annual income is under $2,000
visit a physician during a one-year period,
as compared to 53.9 percent and 57.6 percent,
respectively, of children whose family income
is $10,000 and above and $15,000 and above
(National Center for Health Statistics, 1974a).
Differences in utilization of services cannot
be ascribed solely to lack of money to pay for
them, or to lack of availability. Bergner and
Yerby (1968:543-544) eloquently describe some
of the barriers which make the poor less likely
to take preventive measures or to seek early
health care for acute illnesses:
The location of services, the availability
of transportation and the hours at which the
services are offered all affect the true availability
of the services. Too often these arrangements
reflect that which is convenient for the provider
of service and quite inconvenient for the patient.
. . in many places it may be several weeks
before (the patient) can be fit into the schedule.
In many clinics he faces the prospects of long
waits in dingy surroundings. He may be addressed
in a manner that clearly indicates that the
system regards him as just another burden with
no personal dignity. He is all too likely to
receive a cursory inspection or a single injection
and non-communicative word or two and be sent
on his way. Examinations may be performed without
a modicum of privacy, and his problems discussed
within easy hearing of other patients. If a
course of treatment is prescribed, too little
consideration may be given to whether he can
possibly carry it out -- physically, emotionally,
or financially... The patient's needs, expectations
and priorities are not allowed to interfere
with the functioning of the system.
Such services as these militate against adequate
health care for those people who have no better
alternatives. The country has two systems of
health care: private and frequently inadequate
care for those who can pay; and "public" care,
or no care, for those who cannot. "Public" care,
much of which is provided in hospital outpatient
clinics, 'is generally fragmented, difficult
to get to, overcrowded, and resorted to only
in times of crisis, when the affliction is too
grave not to seek help, however distasteful it
may be (National Center for Health Statistics,
1974a).
For people whose family income is over $15,000,
combined traveling and waiting time to see a
physician is 43 minutes; it is 81 minutes for
those on welfare and 66 minutes for other poor
(National Council of Organizations for Children
and Youth, 1976). Miller (1976) notes that although
children have benefited from the Title XIX (Medicaid)
program relatively less than their elders, the
utilization of medical services by poor, nonwhite,
and rural children has increased by this entitlement.
But the financial floor has not provided a sturdy
base for a child health program, as pointed out
by Foltz and Brown (1975). Within five years
of the 1965 enactment of Title XIX, it became
the major public child health program, serving
nearly 10 percent of all children and commanding
over twice the resources of the Title V health
programs administered by the U.S. Children's
Bureau and state health departments. The 1967
amendment to the Social Security Act linked the
two programs (one a welfare-based payment structure,
the other a health service) by mandating early
and periodic screening, diagnosis, and treatment
("EPSDT") for Medicaid-eligible children
and, for those served through Title V, "early
identification of children in need of health
care and services, and for health care and treatment." In
addition to the four-year lapse before regulations
for EPSDT were promulgated by the Department
of Health, Education, and Welfare, the program
fell heir to systemic problems of both the federal
and state welfare and health bureaucracies. The
lapse demonstrated the Administration's priorities,
as pointed out by the Comptroller General of
the United States (1975) in quoting HEW Secretary
Caspar Weinberger, who said the "embarrassingly
long period of delay and debate [was] occasioned
mainly by a concern over the impact on Federal
and State budgets and on States' medical resources."
In a study of EPSDT and Medicaid in Connecticut,
a relatively wealthy state with many medical
resources, Foltz and Brown (1975) detail why
EPSDT had little impact on child health services:
no new services were developed; a fragmented
child health system was perpetuated; a state
health department was limited to serving as technical
adviser and facilitator; and a conflict between
federal and state policy on eligibility for service
led to a de facto lowering of the priority of
poor children's health services. (A state decision
to reduce welfare costs limited EPSDT funding,
and the federal government did not enforce compliance.)
For families who can pay, the private health
system, though expensive, unevenly distributed,
and in some ways inefficient, can deliver excellent
child health care. The differences between the
two systems, and their relative costs, have been
reviewed by Lowe and Alexander (1974). They conclude
that poor children receive less health service
in all ways.
The facts of the current American health care
system (variety, heterogeneity, specialization,
fragmentation of programs, individualism, fee-for-service,
and "freedom of choice") work against
an adequate, rational basis for assuring the
health of children. Even if every United States
resident had the money to pay for a private practitioner,
there would not be enough health services to
go around, and children's health might not be
advanced. Both rural and urban poverty areas
suffer from a severe shortage of health services.
Those private physicians available to the poor
are frequently overburdened and unable to provide
an adequate range of services for health maintenance.
Between 1949 and 1969 the ratio of physicians
to 1,000 children fell 34 percent from .67 to
.44 (American Academy of Pediatrics, 1970:98).
Beyond the problem of physician availability,
Haggerty (1976) and Miller (1976:17) strongly
urge attention not only to the nature and distribution
of child health services, but to the assurance
of access; in the words of the latter: "The
great need for children's health is not a program
that opens the door and awaits the arrival of
needy children. The great and crying need in
child health is for programs that reach out and
involve children who cannot themselves enter
the system and on whose behalf no present initiative
-is exercised to bring them in."
The above discussion brings into focus several
important issues concerning the status of child
health.
Where the means exist to ameliorate or eradicate
health problems, such means do not equitably
reach and serve the poor and the nonwhite. Thus,
while infectious diseases become decreasingly
important as causes of illness and death among
the white population, they remain a leading
killer of nonwhite children.
When services are provided for the poor,
they frequently neglect minimal needs for privacy,
dignity, and convenience, thus discouraging
their use among those people who most need
them.
Conditions which are primarily associated
with poverty do not receive the concern and
support that other conditions, which may affect
fewer children, but affect middle class as
well as poor children, receive. As noted,
lead poisoning affects more children than did
polio before the Salk vaccine, and unlike polio
before the Salk vaccine, is a curable disease;
yet the government has been unable to commit
the necessary funds to eliminate this major
crippler of children.
While great strides have been made to decrease
the incidence of organic disease phenomena,
both mental illness and risks to children deriving
from their physical and social environment
have been largely ignored and seem to be increasing.
The evidence is unequivocal that poverty and/or
membership in a racial minority not only increase
the likelihood of a serious or fatal physical
or mental health problem, but appear also to
compound the negative effects of virtually all
conditions which predispose a child to further
risk. The problem of low birth weight and its
frequently resultant handicap is a case in point.
Not only is a poor or nonwhite child more likely
to be born premature, but he is more likely than
his white, middle-class counterpart of comparable
birth weight and gestational age to suffer one
or more of the handicaps to which premature birth
predisposes him. The next section of this paper
presents a detailed examination of this aspect
of risk in order to illustrate the pervasiveness
and complexity of the relationships among risk,
handicap, poverty, and race.
The Context of Child Health
Infant Mortality and Morbidity: A Study
of One Aspect of the Relationship Between Race,
Poverty, and Handicap
Infant Mortality: The Social Class and Ethnic
Distribution of Mortality Rates. This
century has witnessed a striking decrease in
overall infant mortality rates, from 140 deaths
per 1,000 live births during the first two
decades, to 16.5 deaths per 1,000 live births
today. Between 1946 and 1966 the rate reached
a plateau (Richmond and Weinberger, 1970).
From 1966 to the present, however, there has
been a continuing decline in infant mortality.
Yet close examination of our infant mortality
rates reveals that infant deaths between one
month and one year of age are three times as
great for our nonwhite as for our white populations,
and the gap has actually increased during the
past decade (Wegman, 1975). At higher income
levels, however, the black infant death rate
shows a marked decline and less discrepancy
with the white rate. For the black income group
between $3,000 and $4,999, the data show a
greater rate of infant deaths than for families
with incomes under $3,000 (National Center
for Health Statistics, 1976a). This might be
explained by greater availability of medical
care for the "most poor." People
with the lowest incomes are eligible for federally
funded medical services that the less poor
are not eligible for, yet are unable to afford
on marginal budgets.
These data suggest that while we are able to
provide medical care comparable in quality to
other countries, it is our more affluent and
generally our white citizens who seem to be benefiting
from our increasing knowledge and skill. Infant
mortality rates are a revealing indicator of
how many of our poor, and particularly our nonwhite,
citizens may be excluded from the services our
health technology can provide.
Low Birth Weight and Infant Mortality The
best indicator of whether or not a baby will
survive is birth weight, even when mortality
rates are corrected for other important variables
such as social class, maternal age, parity, and
race (Fort, 1971). Infants weighing 2,500 grams
or less (under 5 1/2 pounds) have a neonatal
death rate about 22 times the rate for heavier
babies, and account for two-thirds of all neonatal
deaths (Shapiro et al., 1968).
Morbidity: Social Class and Ethnic Distributions
of Birth Weights Since 1950, the distribution
of births by weight for white babies has changed
little, yet among nonwhite babies the proportion
of small-for-date babies has increased markedly.
In terms of numbers, low birth weight affects
roughly twice as many black as white children
(Armstrong, 1972; Niswander and Gordon, 1972).
This disparity in birth weight between black
and white babies may be more a reflection of
the greater proportion of blacks who are poor
than of race. Several studies demonstrate that
an increase in per capita income is associated
with increased birth weights among black infants
(Scott et al., 1950; Naeye et al., 1971).
A study of the correlates of low birth weight
and infant mortality in New York City demonstrates
important relationships between overcrowding
and poverty and perinatal risk (Struening et
al., 1973).
It appears from the evidence available, that
the conditions of poverty, rather than race,
may be primarily implicated in depressed birth
weights.
Morbidity: Maternal Nutrition, Low Birth
Weight, and Subsequent Handicap
Perhaps the most important and direct influence
of the fetal environment is maternal nutrition.
Studies of the effects of wartime nutritional
deprivation on birth weights indicate that mean
birth weights vary consistently with the nutritional
level of the population. The data also suggest
that restoration of an adequate maternal diet,
even during the last weeks of pregnancy, may
be sufficient to overcome the effect on birth
weight of severe deficiency earlier in pregnancy
(Smith, 1947).
Additionally, nutritional supplements during
pregnancy elevate the birth weights of the offspring
of economically deprived mothers (Bergner and
Susser, 1970). Despite methodological flaws in
several of the studies cited by these authors
(such as a lack of careful baseline data on previous
dietary adequacy, imprecise monitoring of dietary
supplementation, and the lack of control populations
in many of the studies), the data consistently
suggest that improving maternal nutrition, regardless
of race, improves the outcome of pregnancy and
increases the birth weight of the infant.
Although the evidence supports a relationship
between maternal malnutrition and low birth weight,
the relation of maternal malnutrition to subsequent
functioning of the child is not entirely clear.
Stein et al. (1975), in their followup study
of the effects of intrauterine exposure to wartime
famine, found that maternal malnutrition per
se does not appear directly to contribute to
their index of adult mental performance of the
children of the famine or to adult health problems.
There was, however, a greater than expected frequency
of congenital anomalies of the central nervous
system.
Although low birth weight is well established
as accounting for excess mortality in infants,
its relationship to child development, both physical
and intellectual, as the previous study demonstrates,
is not as clear.
Fitzhardinge and Stevens (1972) followed prospectively
96 full-term small-for-date infants to determine
the frequency and type of neurological as well
as intellectual sequelae. Although major defects
were uncommon in this sample, a high prevalence
of less severe dysfunction was found relative
to a control group of siblings. Roughly twice
as many of these children displayed EEG abnormalities
than would be expected among apparently normal
children. Twenty-five percent showed some sort
of speech aberration, as contrasted with 1.5
percent in the United States elementary school
population. Average I.Q. was slightly lower for
the small-for-date children than for their control
siblings, but more important, 50 percent of the
boys and 36 percent of the girls had poor school
performance. One-third of the children with I.Q.
results over 100 were failing consistently in
school. The effects of low birth weight were
not necessarily dramatic, nor always directly
measurable. Rather they were frequently reflected
in the "softer" realm of school performance
and may be expressed later in their adult roles
as providers and parents.
The majority of studies correlating low birth
weight (particularly "small-for-date" weight)
with later psychological and intellectual development
do find low-birth-weight children to be significantly
more subject to handicap (Weiner, 1970; Knobloch
and Pasamanick, 1966; Harmeling and Jones, 1968).
The strong relationship between low birth weight
and poor school performance, independent of I.Q.,
demonstrates the inadequacy of I.Q. as a unitary
measure of intellectual functioning and indicates
that the effects of low birth weight on children's
functioning may be more subtle and pervasive
or of a different quality than intelligence testing
can reveal.
The Social Class Distribution of Handicap
In addition to the disproportionate incidence
of low birth weight among the poor and nonwhite
members of our population, one finds that the
sequelae of low birth weight are not equivalent
among various social classes (Naeye et al.,
1971; Niswander and Gordon, 1972; MacMahon
et al., 1972).
Not only is the child born into poverty more
likely to incur perinatal risk, but the handicapping
effects of that risk appear greater than for
middle- and upper-class children born with apparently
equivalent risk (Illsley, 1967). Biochemical
data suggest that major portions of human brain
development are left to postnatal life, and that
alterations in human brain biochemistry following
intrauterine deprivation appear to be recovered
with good postnatal care (Chase, 1973). The Kauai
longitudinal pregnancy study demonstrates that
even severe perinatal stress appears to be compensable
in good postnatal environments (Werner et al.,
1971). For children from the poorest homes, however,
even a moderately low birth weight, between 4
1/2. and 5 1/2 pounds, is likely to be handicapping
(Drillien, 1961).
Additionally, the prevalence of perinatal complications
appears to be greater among upper-class Negroes
than among lower-class whites (MacMahon et al.,
1972). This may be due either to differences
in the quality of medical care given to blacks
of any social class, and/or to the residual effects
of a family history of poverty in a newly middle-class
family.
In summary, the data suggest: (1) that being
poor and/or nonwhite in our society carries with
it greater risk of fetal and infant mortality
and poor birth outcome; (2) that birth outcome
is in large part related to controllable causes;
and (3) that the effects of poor birth outcome
are intensified by growing up poor.
Children's health and productive functioning
are embedded in a social and economic context
which can support or inhibit the development
and the expression of their innate potential.
Fundamental to children's health and functioning
is a health system which is sensitive and responsive
to the circumstances surrounding the establishment
and maintenance of human life.
The Relationship Between Environmental Risk
and Functional Potential
The Heredity-Environment Controversy
Among practitioners and scientists in the United
States today there is a widespread belief that
a child's intelligence as defined by I.Q. tests
reliably measures his potential for mature functioning
in our economic system. Furthermore, several
psychologists and geneticists, most notably Arthur
Jensen (1967) and Richard Herrnstein (1971) have
posited that, because the genetic determinants
of I.Q. are so powerful, environmental manipulation
and improvement of health will have little effect
in raising the I.Q. of the many children who
function below normal levels by this measure
of performance.
This controversy has important implications
for health planners, as well as for educators
and architects of social policy. The following
discussion disputes the argument that environment
does not importantly affect intelligence and
develops a rational philosophic framework for
understanding the importance to children's functioning
of the environment in which they grow; of the
importance of changing those aspects of the environment
which impede growth; of what is necessary to
support those aspects which nurture growth. In
order to make plans for children's health, one
must proceed from a fundamental assumption that
better care will result in the realization of
certain performance objectives, that giving children
help makes a difference.
This is not to say that alleviating human suffering
is in itself an unworthy reason for providing
health service. One may responsibly argue that
in a society as affluent as ours, nurturant human
services should not have to be justified exclusively
on the basis of objective criteria of outcome.
There prevails today, however, a philosophy that
in a competitive economy, investments in health,
or for that matter, in child care, should be
returned in increased productivity on the part
of children and their families. This objective
view must be taken seriously by health providers
and planners whose personal ethical and ideologic
orientations are essentially compassionate and
humane. For as one looks at the data on the suffering
of America's children and its developmental consequences,
one sees that the present child health structure,
which has as its philosophic underpinning the
compassionate response to a child with symptoms,
is not sufficient to deal with conditions which
handicap millions. The authors' discussion is
offered to enhance the evolution of a rational
public policy on children's health, which might
ultimately be more humane than our present one.
Many of the arguments of genetic determinism
are persuasive. Studies of monozygotic twins
reared apart show that their later I.Q.s correlate
more closely with each other than do the I.Q.s
of fraternal twins or siblings raised together,
and adopted children demonstrate I.Q.s and educational
levels which are similar to those of their biological
mothers (Jensen, 1967). The correlation between
the adopted children's I.Q.s and the educational
attainment of their foster mothers, however,
is negligible. By contrast, a similar study demonstrates
a 20-point gain in the I.Q.s of adopted children
over that of their biological mothers (Skodak
and Skeels, 1945), and Bronfenbrenner (1976)
points out that foster- and adoptive-home placement
is not random; that adoptive children are likely
to be placed with families whose background is
in many ways similar to that of the natural mother.
Whether I.Q. tests are accurate predictors of
adult functional potential is open to serious
question. Unfortunately, they have been used
widely as the major indicator of the effects
of programs for disadvantaged children, such
as Project Headstart. The heritability argument
and unsullied belief in the predictive value
of I.Q. measures can be and have been used unscientifically
to discredit many efforts towards remediation
of the effects of poverty. They support the contention
that poverty is inevitable.
If the genetic consequences of years of selective
breeding among people of low social class or
nonwhite ethnic origin, or "low capacity
residue," is considered an inevitable outcome,
and if that "residue" largely accounts
for membership in present-day lower socioeconomic
class, a preponderance of which is nonwhite,
certain political and racial implications follow.
Efforts to enable poor people to develop the
competence with which to achieve access to the
goods and services of society, the argument follows,
are doomed to fail.
The heredity-environment controversy is a hot
issue today. The assumptions underlying it, that
intelligence is a quantity, that it is unequally
distributed (by nonrandom, genetic determinants),
that it can accurately be measured, and that
it predicts economic functioning are accepted
by many, if not most, teachers, psychologists,
physicians, and policy makers. Health planners
must address the issue directly. To what extent
will efforts to improve the health and quality
of the life of our nation's children succeed
in making their lives more productive and happy?
Differential Environmental Importance for
Intellectual Functioning among the Poor and
the Non Poor
A major assumption of the genetic determinists
is that intelligence is fixed, because of its
high hereditary component, and that the hereditary
component of intellectual functioning has roughly
the same weight for various populations of people.
That there is a genetic component to intellectual
functioning is not at issue; that it is unrelated
and unresponsive to environmental circumstances
and environmental change is.
A study of twins from Philadelphia suggests
that the relative power of heredity or environment
to influence performance might be different among
different population groups (Scarr-Salapatek,
1971). On a standard achievement test, scores
of black twins were not found to be as similar
to each other as the scores of white twins. And
among lower income children, the scores of same-sex
twins (which would include monozygotic twins
who share the same genetic structure) were no
more alike than the scores of the opposite-sex
twins. Among upper income children of both races,
however, the scores of the same-sex twins were
more similar to each other than the scores of
the opposite-sex twins.
If heredity were the primary determining factor
in the test scores, one would expect the identical
twin pairs to score more closely together than
the non-identical twins, irrespective of environ
mental factors. It appears from these findings
that among middle- and upper-class children,
genetic capabilities are more directly expressed
in test scores. Therefore children who share
the same genetic structure do indeed perform
more similarly, when they are not economically
disadvantaged; the environment exerts more influence
in defining the functional potential of poor
than of nonpoor children. Bronfenbrenner (1976:141),
in a penetrating discussion of the heredity-environment
controversy, suggests that performance reflects
not simply a given amount of genetic potential,
but also the capacity of a given environment
to "evoke and nurture the expression of
genetic potential." A critical function
of his surroundings, then, is to facilitate the
development of a child's innate endowment.
The above discussion develops an argument on
several levels to demonstrate the importance
of environmental factors to the development of
children. Poor and nonwhite children are far
more likely to be born at significant risk than
nonpoor and white children. A financially impoverished
environment exaggerates the potential for handicap
following that risk. But, a nurturant and supportive
environment can permit the natural unfolding
of a child's best qualities and capabilities.
The implication of these arguments is that poverty
is not an inevitable outcome of genetic selection,
as has been claimed (Herrnstein, 1971), and that
social policy directed toward the remediation
of selected problems associated with poverty
is not doomed to fail because of the genetic
makeup of that population. This is not to say
that poverty is an aggregate of "selected
problems," and that giving economically
deprived pregnant mothers dietary supplements,
for example, will solve the complex processes
in our society by which poverty, and its human
damage, is perpetuated. Thoughtful health planning
as well as other kinds of social planning depends
not only on the provision of services in order
to ameliorate problems which cause suffering
and which can be alleviated, but also with larger
public measures which affect the environment,
people's prejudices (Comely, 1976), and the distribution
of economic resources.
The Concept of Child Health
The importance to children's health and functioning
of the environment underlines the need to understand
children's health in a broad context. Health
is clearly not simply a matter of Band Aids and
patchwork. Health requires prevention; it requires
environmental amelioration; it requires ensuring
a context which is capable of nurturing and sustaining
a child in health as well as in sickness. The
concept of child health must include a child's
context as well as the child. The concept of
intervention should embrace treatment of causes
as well as treatment of symptoms.
In this section, the conceptualization of child
health will be reexamined, and alternative concepts
and their practical expressions offered.
Health and the Ecology of Childhood
An alarming number of children suffer disease
and death from environmentally derived causes.
The relationship between the environment and
morbidity and mortality seems clear when one
considers accidents, lead poisoning, child abuse
and neglect, failure to thrive, and increased
perinatal risk. Additionally a relationship exists
between the environment and the occurrence of
organic illness, not only in the child but in
his family, above and beyond the inadequacy of
our health service structure to deliver technical
services to the many in need.
Environmental factors which are detrimental
to child health can be considered in two conceptual "layers." The
first "layer" is that which is most
proximal, or most immediately "causal" to
a particular disease. Lead paint is the direct
cause of lead poisoning; an inflicted injury
is the direct cause of child abuse; accessible
hazards may be the direct cause of an accident;
unfluoridated water causes a high caries rate.
The second layer concerns adult functioning.
Our present health structure cannot adequately
acknowledge the relation between adult dysfunction
and childhood illness, between the needs of families
and their relation to children's health. Childhood
illness deriving from dilapidated housing (plumbism),
overcrowding (infectious disease), inadequate
nutrition (iron deficiency anemia, malnutrition,
prematurity), or accessible hazards (accidents,
poisonings) may be morefundamentally a reflection
of parental needs: for employment in order to
afford to house and feed a family adequately;
for health care for themselves; for help to overcome
alcoholism or drug addiction; for family planning;
for day care to get some relief from the frustration
of spending all day every day in a two-room apartment
with four underclothed, underfed, crying preschool
children; for adequate transportation in order
to get to jobs, services, and day care.
Child Health and Poverty
A child has a right to health. This generally
accepted principle presents a challenge to
the American health care structure. If our
health system attends to the ecology of childhood,
the relation of a child's life circumstances
to his health will lead to an understanding
of the need to increase the jobs, goods, and
services available to poor people.
Given what we know of the impact of poverty
on children's health and life functioning, it
is timely to make a principled and strong statement
about its relation to the planning of health
programs. Poverty, in the United States and elsewhere,
appears to cause -- directly or indirectly --
a great amount of morbidity and mortality in
children. Its essentially destructive quality
is paid for not only in human suffering, but
also in subsequent hospital costs, reduced productivity,
drug abuse, and crime.
In present practice, perhaps two-thirds of American
children receive what is considered to be adequate
health care. The free market economic structure
in which health services are distributed leads
them to contact reasonably skilled practitioners
whose understanding of the subtleties of childhood
illness and behavior leads to prompt amelioration
of early disease states. Their immunizations
are complete, and their nutritional status is
adequate.
For the other 25 million children in America
who are unable to buy private health care, and
who have in addition an increased risk of parental
illness and distress, perinatal mishap, and personal
illness, health care is provided by a patchwork
quilt of categorical programs, entitling some
but not all to certain specific services provided
by clinics, hospitals, and practitioners. The
nature of the commitment of public resources
to these programs sustains a concept of the treatment
of special classes of illness in special populations.
It fails to acknowledge the importance for children's
health of the satisfaction of basic needs of
all families for the health of all their members,
for adequate income, housing, food; of the harmful
effects on children's health of environments
which lack those basic needs; and of the increased
incidence of alcoholism, drug abuse, and adult
mental illness in homes where those needs are
unable to be met. By entitling only a few members
of a family to receive only a certain number
of specific services, it militates against comprehensive
health care or the prevention of those illnesses
(and decreased functioning) of children which
derive partly or entirely from illnesses and
distress in their family. Childhood tuberculosis,
gonorrhea, and psychiatric illness are specific
diseases in point.
There have nonetheless been important and encouraging
results from such comprehensive programs as the
Maternal and Infant Health programs of the Department
of Health, Education, and Welfare. Prenatal clinic
registrations for the estimated 700,000 mothers
eligible rose from fewer than 60,000 in 1965
to around 141,000 in 1971. In Denver, a dramatic
fall in infant mortality rate from 34.2/1000
live births in 1964 to 21.5/1000 in 1969 was
observed for the 25 census tracts which made
up the target area for an M. and I. program.
In Birmingham, Alabama, the rate decreased from
25.4 in 1965 to 14.3 in 1969; in Omaha from 33.4
in 1964 to 13.4 in 1969. Similarly dramatic reductions
in the percentages of mothers receiving no prenatal
care have been achieved by M. and I. programs
in Dade County, Florida; Baltimore, Maryland;
Cincinnati, Ohio; Greensville, South Carolina;
and Atlanta, Georgia (Maternal and Child Health
Services, 1971; 1973). The current Administration's
inability to sustain-much less to increase-these
programs suggests a tragic misdirection of public
priorities.
Child Health and the Concept of Diagnosis
Both organic and behavioral illness manifest
themselves in childhood with less differentiated
symptoms than analogous processes in adulthood.
Clinical practice usually requires a more or
less precise diagnostic formulation before
treatment can proceed. Where the understanding
of the phenomenon at hand is less than adequate,
empiric intervention of an idiosyncratic nature
begins. Such is the case with poorly understood
organic diseases, such as the hemolyticuremic
syndrome and Reye's disease syndrome where
the individual case receives the best the individual
physician can offer, and with behavioral illness,
where the clinician treats on the basis of
a personal, abstract formulation of the nature
of the individual's problem.
"Diagnosis" in both organic and behavioral
situations represents an intellectual effort
to integrate signs of illness into a coherent
whole. Clinical nomenclature describes groups
of manifest symptoms; where little is known,
it defines neither pathophysiologic mechanisms
nor specific causes of disease.
Illness phenomena in children are frequently
complex layerings of increasingly proximal cause.
The diagnosis of a childhood illness ought additionally
to take into consideration the continuing change
of the developing organism. A weakness of the
current diagnostic nomenclature is in its neglect
of causal and developmental, in favor of manifestational,
descriptors of illness phenomena. This is particularly
true for the several pediatric symptom groups
which seem primarily to derive from "social" or
interpersonal causes. These "illnesses" include:
failure to thrive
accidents and ingestions
child abuse and neglect
pica and poisoning with lead-based paint
rumination
excessive bottle feeding (often with iron-deficiency
anemia as a consequence)
"idiopathic" feeding disorders without
demonstrable organic cause
"habit" disorders
learning disability
hyperactivity
bronchial asthma
The individual physician's capacity to perceive
all of the pertinent information on a given child
with poorly differentiated illness is necessarily
limited. He is constrained by a mother's ability
to observe and accurately report a child's illness
data. (Since her own behavior may be a principal
cause of her child's symptoms, the information
she provides must be elicited skillfully and
interpreted critically.) The nature and scope
of clinical practice and professional training
do not equip the physician to interpret the various
psychological and environmental phenomena which
operate to produce a particular symptom in an
individual child who presents to him at a particular
time.
A more causally and developmentally sensitive
diagnostic nomenclature is necessary, both to
guide the practitioner in sorting through the
multiple variables attending illness, and as
a conceptual basis for developing a preventively
oriented child health care system.
Preventive Services: Early Identification
and Amelioration of Risk
The critical quality of childhood is change.
A growing human organism is especially vulnerable
in his early years. His ability to resist infection
and his capacity to fend alone are limited; his
nervous system and his ability to operate in
an organized way on his environment are constrained
by a prolonged period of dependency. As his innate
structure matures, he is susceptible to many
exogenous influences. To the extent that he is
protected from too great physical and psychological
risks, the process of growth will lead to his
development into a healthy and integrated person.
On the other hand, if risks to his development
are not identified and ameliorated early, his
growth may be affected adversely and profoundly.
The consequences of physical and psychological
illness early in life may not become apparent
until later. The developing nervous system is
especially vulnerable. For example, early infection
exerts an important toll in later dysfunction.
In regard to his personality, for example, serious
parental psychologic disturbance may be associated
with later stigmata of childhood behavioral deviancy;
violence in the home in early childhood seems
to be associated with aggressive behavior in
adolescence and adulthood; and early separation
or parental loss are associated with an increased
risk of psychiatric disability.
A health structure designed to maintain the
well-being of children will have to acknowledge
the process of change in childhood. The importance
of intervening early in illnesses which may present
in subtle early forms means that the fundamental
concept of the system should be the prevention
of illness.
Specific services, able to identify early risks
and act on them, do not, in general, exist at
present in the American health structure. This
is partly due to the nature of current medical
practice, which is usually limited to episodic
contacts during specific illnesses once a child's
immunizations are complete. To be sure, as was
pointed out earlier, not all American children
even receive immunizations. To maintain children's
health adequately, a commitment to provide necessary
services will have to be made. Their right to
health could be assured, with their access to
all phases of the health care system a matter
of fundamental entitlement. Their potential health
problems should be identified early, as detailed
below, and an orientation of the system toward
assuring their adequate growth and development
by preventing illness and its consequences would
lead to a different organizational and financial
structure for child health services.
Toward Rational Problem-Solving: Screening
for Risk and Delivery of Service as a Matter
of Right
A more nearly universal care system, with equal
access to health services for all the nation's
children, would go far to ameliorate the problems
and consequences of childhood disease among both
rich and poor. Fundamental conceptual changes
in the nature of the delivery of health services
to children would involve; in addition to entitlement,
(1) an ability to understand -- and to act on
-- the relation of a child's environment to his
health (e.g., lead-based paint and household
hazards); (2) an understanding of child development
as a dynamic process where the family-child dyad
is the ideal unit of practice; and (3) a capacity
to perceive the special process of sampling which
leads to an acknowledgment of illness in certain
populations but not in others (e.g., psychiatric
illness in children of upper income families
is currently more likely to be ascertained and
treated than in children of lower-income families,
where it may be ignored or regarded as normative
behavior; whereas child abuse case reports are
virtually only of poor children) (Joint Commission
on the Mental Health of Children, 1970; Newberger
and Daniel, 1976).
The screening of children for risk
at certain intervals has been discussed widely;
it has never been systematically implemented
in America. The Developmental Disabilities Act
and the plans for the identification of handicaps
in many states give hope for a more effective
instrument for sensing needs in childhood and
delivering service when it is needed.
The technical methodology of health screening
for children is amply discussed in the current
medical literature (Franken burg and Camp, 1975).
Although there is no universal agreement on the
number of screening studies to be performed at
particular levels, nor on the length of the intervals,
there is consensus on the need for early recognition
when prevention or treatment is most likely to
be effective, as well as for the identification
of the populations at greatest risk and therefore
most likely to benefit from specific procedures.
When Title XIX of the Social Security Act was
amended in 1967 to make health screening for
childhood Medicaid recipients mandatory, it was
with a view to encouraging the use of health
resources before illnesses became irreversible
or chronic.
Whether health screening ought primarily to
take place in medical as opposed to other service
structures is less a subject of current discussion.
For the most part, preschool children in America
are not consistently in contact with any institution
of society, and it seems logical that whichever
component of the service system a preschool child
contacts should see to it that his health needs
are met.
The fundamental concepts are entitlement and access;
the specific institutional setting in which the
need for services is defined is less important.
Were all children receiving continuing comprehensive
health care (which would include all appropriate
techniques for the identification of risks and
developmental deviations), then screening per
se would not be necessary.
The several options for the site of preventive
child health services include the health care
system itself, child care institutions, and the
welfare structure. Irrespective of where the
screening and preventive care for children take
place, however, its universality is a primary
goal. It is likely that the future health care
system for children in America will be pluralistic,
both in respect to the institutions offering
service and the specific populations served.
Equal access to high-quality services, and an
adequate distribution of resources to all the
nation's children cannot simply be assumed: aggressive "outreach" including
health education and screening, to those not
customarily entitled -- the poor, the children
of migrants, children in institutions or in foster
care, for example -- will be necessary.
Health Advocacy as a Technical Method for
Realizing Child Health Objectives: The "Social" Illnesses
of Childhood as a Model for Action
The Concept of Advocacy
Certain illnesses of very young children represent
symptoms of severe distress in their families.
The seemingly increasing prevalence of these
diseases, which have important implications
for the later physical and emotional health
of these children, has focused much attention
about what may be necessary to identify and
control them. The question in regard to these "social" illnesses
of early childhood has more general implications
for child health, and particularly for mental
health. It has to do with what we are able
to bring ourselves to do for families and children
in serious trouble and our capacity to look
critically at our professional activities and
to acknowledge and act on their limitations.
In the interval between birth and four years
of age, the impact of an inadequate nurturing
environment is manifested powerfully, if not
irreversibly, on a developing child. Certain
clinical syndromes present urgent evidence of
a major threat to the child's adequate growth,
if not to his very survival. These illnesses
are childhood accidents and ingestions, pica
(or the relentless craving for non-food substances,
leading occasionally to poisoning by lead-based
paint), failure to thrive, and child abuse and
neglect. They are not confined to a particular
social class, and they account for a considerable
share of early childhood morbidity and mortality
in the United States. These illnesses appear
to derive from situations of family distress,
including poverty, poor housing, illness in one
or both parents, marital difficulty, drug dependency,
and joblessness. Such distress in a family's
life setting seems to affect the parents' realistic
perceptions and expectations of their child and
their capacity to provide for his needs and to
protect him from harm.
Medical and psychiatric treatment for this group
of illnesses in childhood often seem to bear
no consistent relation to the outcome. There
are many reasons for this unfortunate fact, which
have to do partly, but not exclusively, with
the limitations of professional knowledge and
competence. They include public policies toward
poor people, among whom these illnesses seem
particularly prevalent, an inadequate commitment
to provide the services needed to help these
unfortunate families, and a curious and regrettable
tendency to "blame the victim" if his
illness derives from his life circumstances (Ryan,
1971). It seems as though the traditional doctor-patient
or therapist-patient relationship is simply not
sufficient to affect the causes of these disorders,
which may be based less in the parents' personal
life-adaptations than in their environments.
Families' housing, jobs, and financial and legal
worries are not the traditional ground for medical
intervention; doctors, psychiatrists, social
workers, and nurses do relatively little to effect
the kinds of changes which are necessary to prevent
recurrence of these illnesses in many of the
children at risk and to prevent the serious social
sequelae of these early childhood illnesses.
For a professional person to acknowledge this
fact means abandoning his strict technical role
|